Monday, March 03, 2008


Ron Paul: Bernanke Deliberately Destroying Dollar

Congressman schools Fed chairman again during House Financial Services Committee meeting, warns "history is against you"

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet

Congressman Ron Paul slammed Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke during a House Financial Services Committee meeting today for following a policy of deliberately destroying the dollar and wiping out the American middle class.

Paul held Bernanke to task over his refusal to address the decline of the dollar and its clear link to inflation.

"Inflation comes from the unwise increase in the supply of money credit....to argue that we can continue to debase the currency, which is really the policy of that you're following, purposely debasing value of currency - which to me seems so destructive....it just puts more pressure on the federal reserve to create capital out of thin air in order to stimulate the economy and usually that just goes into mal-investment," said Paul.

Paul highlighted the fact that the M3 money supply was rising at a rate of 16 per cent and that this was the real rate of inflation.

"History is against you," Paul told Bernanke, "History is on the side of hard money - if you look at stable prices you have to look at the only historic sound money that's lasted more than a few years - fiat money always ends, gold is the only thing where you get stable prices," he added, pointing out that despite the price of oil's rapid ascent, it had remained flat when compared to the price of gold.

"I cannot see how we can continue to accept the policy of deliberately destroying the value of money as an economic value," said Paul, adding that the policy was "immoral," and would lead to a reduction in American's living standards and "the middle class being wiped out."

Asked how he could defend a policy of deliberately depreciating the dollar, Bernanke stumbled through his response and was basically forced to agree with Paul's point.

Paul's comments come on the day that the dollar hit its all time low against the Euro.

Earlier this week, former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan laid the groundwork for the further collapse of the greenback by encouraging Gulf states to abandon their dollar peg.


Half of world to live in cities by end '08
By Louis Charbonneau

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - By the end of this year one half of the world's population will be living in cities for the first time in human history, the United Nations said in a new report released on Tuesday.

According to the report, by the year 2050 there will be 6.4 billion people living in cities, up from 3.3 billion at present. The world's total population is expected to rise to 9.2 billion in 2050 from the current figure of 6.7 billion.

As urbanization increases, the world's rural population is expected to begin declining in around a decade and should fall to 2.8 billion people in 2050 from 3.4 billion in 2007, the report said.
Some countries, like India -- home to two of the world's biggest metropolises, Mumbai and Delhi with 19 and 18.8 million people respectively in 2007 -- aim to slow down the process of urbanization by encouraging development of rural areas.

Despite the challenges urbanization poses for governments and local authorities, Hania Zlotnik, head of the U.N. Population Division, told reporters urbanization is generally a sign of a lively economy.

"Governments would be well advised that urban growth is a proof of economic dynamism," Zlotnik told reporters.

Still, intense urbanization and the expected addition of eight new "megacities" -- cities with 10 million or more inhabitants -- by the year 2025 will pose new challenges.
Governments need to make sure large urban populations have access to basic services, above all health care, Zlotnik said.

Asia and Africa are still mostly rural but will see booming urban populations over the next few decades. Both have around 40 percent in cities and 60 percent in the countryside now.

But this is steadily changing. Half of Africa's population will be in cities by between 2045 and 2050 while Asia will reach that point between 2020 and 2025, Zlotnik said.

Around 40 percent of China's population is in cities now, a figure that is expected to exceed 70 percent by 2050, when over 1 billion people will be living in Chinese cities, she said.
By 2025, China's booming foreign investment center Shenzhen, which borders Hong Kong, will join Beijing and Shanghai as China's third megacity with 10.2 million people, the U.N. report projected.

The world's second most populous country, India, has only 29 percent of its population in cities at the moment. By 2050, India will have 55 percent of its people in urban centers.
"India is expected to urbanize much less than China and therefore it's expected to remain the country with the world's largest rural population," Zlotnik said.

But India will get two new megacities to join Mumbai and Delhi by 2025 -- Calcutta, which will have an estimated 20.6 million people, and Madras with 10.1 million.

Europe will continue to lag well behind the urbanization seen elsewhere, the U.N. report said. Of the 19 megacities today, the only European metropolises are Moscow and Istanbul.
By 2025 there will be 27 megacities and Europe will add only one more to the list -- Paris. It will have an estimated 10 million people, making it number 27 on the list.

Tokyo is projected to remain the most populous city in the world. With 35.7 million people in its urban agglomeration at last count, this should rise to 36.4 million by 2025, it said.
Africa currently has only one megacity -- Egypt's capital Cairo. Joining the ranks of megacities by 2025 will be Kinshasa in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Lagos, Nigeria.


Former Congressman Warns Of Martial Law Camps In America
San Francisco Chronicle
Homeland Security ENDGAME

Steve Watson

An article co-written by a former Congressman and carried by the San Francisco Chronicle has gained much attention recently as it shines light on a coordinated federal government program to build detention camps at undisclosed locations within the United States.

"Since 9/11, and seemingly without the notice of most Americans, the federal government has assumed the authority to institute martial law, arrest a wide swath of dissidents (citizen and noncitizen alike), and detain people without legal or constitutional recourse in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants in the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs." write Lewis Seiler and former Congressman Dan Hamburg of the watchdog group Voice of the Environment, Inc.

Voice of the Environment's mission is to educate the public regarding the transfer of public trust assets into private, mostly corporate, hands.

The article continues:

Beginning in 1999, the government has entered into a series of single-bid contracts with Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) to build detention camps at undisclosed locations within the United States. The government has also contracted with several companies to build thousands of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles, ostensibly to transport detainees.

According to diplomat and author Peter Dale Scott, the KBR contract is part of a Homeland Security plan titled ENDGAME, which sets as its goal the removal of "all removable aliens" and "potential terrorists."

Seiler and Hamburg also warn of the alarming and numerous freedom killing pieces of legislation that have been passed recently, dovetailing with the build up of infrastructure of tyranny inside the US.

We have previously highlighted the shocking details behind this shining example of modern day corporate fascism.

The issue gained national attention two years ago when it was announced that Kellogg, Brown and Root had been awarded a $385 million dollar contract by Homeland Security to construct detention and processing facilities in the event of a national emergency.

The language of the preamble to the agreement veils the program with talk of temporary migrant holding centers, but it is made clear that the camps will also be used "as the development of a plan to react to a national emergency."

Following the story, first given wide attention by http://www.prisonplanet.com/, the Alternet website put together an alarming report that collated all the latest information on plans to initiate internment of political subversives and Muslims after the next major terror attack in the US.

The article highlighted the disturbing comments of Sen. Lindsey Graham, who encouraged torture supporting then Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to target, "Fifth Columnists" Americans who show disloyalty and sympathize with "the enemy," whoever that enemy may be.
It is important to stress that the historical precedent mirrors exactly what the Halliburton camp deal outlines. Oliver North's Reagan era Rex 84 plan proposed rounding up 400,000 refugees, under FEMA, in the event of "uncontrolled population movements" over the Mexican border into the United States.

The real agenda, just as it is with Halliburton's gulags, was to use the cover of rounding up immigrants and illegal aliens as a smokescreen for targeting political dissidents. From 1967 to 1971 the FBI kept a list of persons to be rounded up as subversive, dubbed the "ADEX" list.
According to author Naomi Wolf, the National Counterterrorism Center today holds the names of roughly 775,000 "terror suspects" with the number increasing by 20,000 per month.

Discussions of federal concentration camps are no longer the rhetoric of paranoid Internet conspiracy theorists, they are mainstream news.

Halliburton, through their KBR subsidiary, is the same company that built most of the major new detention camps in Iraq and Afghanistan. KBR have been embroiled in a human sex slave trade that their representatives have lobbied to continue.

We have a company that has been handed a contract to build prison camps in America that is engaged in trafficking young girls and women. Can this horror movie get any more frightening? Sadly, yes.

A much discussed and circulated report, the Pentagon's Civilian Inmate Labor Program, has recently been updated and the revision details a "template for developing agreements" between the Army and corrections facilities for the use of civilian inmate labor on Army installations."
The plan is clearly to swallow up disenfranchised groups like prisoners, immigrants and Muslims at first and then extend the policy to include 'Fifth Columnists,' otherwise known as anyone who disagrees with the government or exercises their Constitutional rights.

Respected author Peter Dale Scott speculated that the "detention centers could be used to detain American citizens if the Bush administration were to declare martial law."
Daniel Ellsberg, former Special Assistant to Assistant Secretary of Defense, called the plan, "preparation for a roundup after the next 9/11 for Mid-Easterners, Muslims and possibly dissenters. They've already done this on a smaller scale, with the 'special registration' detentions of immigrant men from Muslim countries, and with Guantanamo."

George Bush has declared himself to be dictator and to have supreme power over and above the limitations of the US Constitution. Bush administration officials like Alberto Gonzales have declared Bush to be "above the law." White House advisors are openly discussing the legality of crushing a child's testicles as part of the war on terror. Preparation for the internment of thousands of Americans who are 'disloyal' in times of emergency are afoot.

Under the enemy combatant designation anyone at the behest of the US government, even if they are a US citizen, can be kidnapped and placed in an internment facility forever without trial. Jose Padilla, an American citizen, spent over four years in a Navy brig before being brought to trial.

In 2002, FEMA sought bids from major real estate and engineering firms to construct giant internment facilities in the case of a chemical, biological or nuclear attack or a natural disaster.
Okanogan County Commissioner Dave Schulz went public three years ago with his contention that his county was set to be a location for one of the camps.

Furthermore, in May 2006, we exposed the existence of a nationwide FEMA program which is training Pastors and other religious representatives to become secret police enforcers who teach their congregations to "obey the government" in preparation for the implementation of martial law, property and firearm seizures, mass vaccination programs and forced relocation.
A whistleblower who was secretly enrolled into the program told us that the feds were clandestinely recruiting religious leaders to help implement Homeland Security directives in anticipation of a potential bio-terrorist attack, any natural disaster or a nationally declared emergency.

The first directive was for Pastors to preach to their congregations Romans 13, the often taken out of context bible passage that was used by Hitler to hoodwink Christians into supporting him, in order to teach them to "obey the government" when martial law is declared.

It was related to the Pastors that quarantines, martial law and forced relocation were a problem for state authorities when enforcing federal mandates due to the "cowboy mentality" of citizens standing up for their property and second amendment rights as well as farmers defending their crops and livestock from seizure.

It was stressed that the Pastors needed to preach subservience to the authorities ahead of time in preparation for the round-ups and to make it clear to the congregation that "this is for their own good."

Pastors were told that they would be backed up by law enforcement in controlling uncooperative individuals and that they would even lead SWAT teams in attempting to quell resistance.
Though some doubted the accuracy of this report at the time due to its fundamentally disturbing implications, the story was later confirmed by a KSLA 12 news report, in which participating clergy and officials admitted to the existence of the program.

What could the government be contemplating that leads it to make contingency plans to detain without recourse millions of its own citizens? ask Lewis Seiler and Dan Hamburg in the conclusion to their article.

The answer clearly lies in the fact that over the past decade we have witnessed an extreme acceleration of the physical implementation of a framework and infrastructure ready to receive those who will not go along with a coordinated destruction of traditional American values and freedom.



School Bans Hugs Over 2 Seconds
Students Don't Embrace 'Public Display Of Affection' Policy

MESA, Ariz. -- A school policy banning student hugging prompted dozens of east Valley students to protest with a giant group hug across the street from campus.

"I think it's ridiculous," said Chelsea Branham, a 14-year-old student at Shepherd Junior High School in east Mesa.
Branham said she got detention this week for hugging her friend after school.

"It's not like it's supposed to mean anything," she said. "It's not like I was making out with him or something."

Branham joined her classmates on Friday for a 20-minute, public hug-a-thon.

"She's taking a stand and I'm standing behind her to do it," said Stephanie Wiegold, her mother.
The "no-hugging" rule had previously been in the student handbook. After many students began expressing concern about public hugging and kissing in the hallways, the school began reinforcing the guideline by punishing huggers, which led to Friday's protest.

Prior to the demonstration, the district said the principal and students brokered an agreement to clarify the "no-hugging" rule. According to the guidelines, small hugs, less than two seconds, are permitted but longer ones and kissing are not.

"We can only hug two seconds? That's ridiculous," Branham said. "It's barely even a hug."
"What we're doing here is hoping to help kids understand what's happening," said Kathy Bareiss of Mesa public schools.

The district said a list of acceptable and non-acceptable behaviors will be handed out to students on Monday.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007


"...the high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom, and before I leave office, I must inform the citizens of this plight." -John F. Kennedy (November 12, 1963, Columbia U, 10 days before his assassination)


Are People Really Stupid ­ Or Is It Something Else?
By Ted Twietmeyer

In the morning and afternoon each weekday my drive takes my by a pasture of grazing Buffalo. Looking like a dark brown walking lawn grown out of control, they peacefully meander about all day in search of a tasty morsel of flora. These innocent herbivores have absolutely no idea what their future holds in store for them, but we do. They have the same dark future as other cattle.

Are there parallels between people and cattle? In a way there are. However, even if cattle were aware of their fate, there is little they could do about it. We are on the outside looking in ­ but cattle are on the inside looking out. Quite a big difference. At least for now.

"Keeping up with the Jones' " has been a way of life in America extending deep into her past, and a syndrome which probably exists in most civilized countries. Curiously, this is a phenomenon of the rich and middle class but not so much for the poor. When we were married in 1975 there was no silver spoon, no endowment, no fistfuls of stock certificates or other handouts. In fact, we were quietly married by a town JP. I'm still glad of that to this day. In fact, we rented a house in what many would call "the combat zone" in a medium sized city. The thought of being robbed was always present. When you go without many things, it makes you try harder, and strengthens your resolve to improve your life.

But through it all did have time to try to keep up with what the Jones's were doing? Heck no! We were too preoccupied with making ends meet. When our youngest was about to enter school, it was time to move back out to the suburbs. And move we did. On the very day we went to go sign an apartment lease we came back home and found we were robbed. We lived there three years without any problems until that day. What irony.

The more money most people earn, the more they want and expect. In fact, for some it becomes a pathetic, obsessive way of life. Their version of "God" becomes the accumulation of worthless Federal Reserve Notes stuffed in their pocket. Or running up insane balances for credit card junk purchases, for which greedy banks freely extend more and more credit until the person is buried too deep to get out. It proves the old expression - "give someone enough rope and they will hang themselves.

Both mainstream and offshoot denomination Christians frequently fall into the money traps. They may attend church every week but their REAL God quietly resides on numerous pieces of green-inked worthless paper kept inside folded leather, tucked inside a purse or back pocket. Isn't money a nice god? He doesn't mind how many times you touch him. You can sit on him as long as you want, without fear of being sent to hell (though he can help get you there quicker.) Run him through the washer and dryer and he won't complain. Drive over him with a truck and he still won't complain. Keeps a licking and keeps on ticking. (Couldn't resist using that one.)

As a side note - Was president Jackson was the inspiration for Gene Roddenberry's character "Landrew" on the original Star Trek series? Landrew was a computer projection of the computer's creator on a distant planet. He kept the population in line for hundreds of years using hooded men called "lawgivers." Landrew was the spitting image of president Jackson on our currency today! Right down to his hair style.

Mandatory church attendance is exactly what the King of England required of early American settlers, and the king forced people to rent pews in churches. It was not an option. And they had better be in them on Sunday morning or else. This also held true in the 1700's in an Episcopal Church in the city of Richmond, VA. where Patrick Henry gave his famous speech on March 23rd, 1775. You can still tour this church today. Rarely are there any lines for tours which are given each hour. [1]


What about the cattle of Patrick Henry's day? Graves outside of Patrick Henry's church had marble tables which sit atop four pillars mounted directly over each grave (see below.)

Only some people could afford the marble tops to protect their grave from cattle.
Was this the final word of that day to "keep up with the Jones'?" (Photo - author)

Did family members come to the cemetery to have picnics with the departed using these marble slabs as picnic tables? Yes they did, according to the meticulously accurate former Marine tour guide at the church. But the REAL purpose of the marble slabs was far more practical. It simply kept the free-roaming heavy livestock 200 years ago from collapsing the buried casket below and falling into the grave. Three hundred years ago this part of the City of Richmond, VA was still countryside and farmland. Picture this if you can ­ church services taking place inside, while the town's cattle freely stomping around in the cemetery outside (and relieving themselves anywhere they want, too.) All this was going on while Patrick Henry was giving his famous speech. Did cattle of yesteryear or today, care about material possessions or money?

So where are we going with all this? Think about knowing your neighbor as thyself. It's easy for Patriots to look upon those who have not yet undergone a paradigm shift, and laugh and look down upon them. But changing one's mindset IS serious business. Like it or not, you too were once in the same mindless state like cattle. There will be many reasons why your friends, neighbors or relatives don't want to hear any "conspiracy theories." Many are already programmed to believe that what you may try to teach them about is invalid, even before they hear it. These people are now, as you once were. When this happens, think back to those days when you were like that, too. Now think about what it took to change your thinking. You can probably remember when and where you were when your paradigm shift happened. This epiphany is incredibly powerful and reaches deep into your very soul. That's why you still remember it.

People aren't necessarily stupid ­ just preprogrammed from childhood. Correcting this problem is similar to erasing a corrupted computer hard drive by reformatting it. People may not require reformatting, but will first require a slow erasure of their "bad data." This almost never happens overnight and requires time and patience. It can range from days to perhaps months, even years. (Although we have very few years left, if any.) If you don't personally have the patience to help people remove their bad data and follow it through, then don't try. If you start the process and don't finish it, it can and will permanently damage your relationship with them. They will think you're a crackpot for years to come. It is NOT up to you to delete their preprogramming. You must give them the impetus to do it themselves. It's quite amazing that there are several parallels between computer hard disks and the human mind.

To help people reprogram themselves will be to travel a path paved with broken glass, upon which you must tread with bare feet. The broken glass represents the questions your "student" will have as you shatter his or her preconceived notions and preprogramming, and the bare feet represent exposing what's deep in your heart. You must show them what's in your heart and what you hold dear at some point in the process. This is what they will be looking for. Sure, doing this is a risk and a gamble. But no price can be placed upon the value of doing it and succeeding at it.

When looked at in the cold light of logic, is there anything to lose? If people do not reprogram themselves in time, they will surely fall into the traps that await them after the great collapse. For example, those who are still programmed will willingly and foolishly seek out a relocation (concentration) camp, thinking that the government is there to help them. It will be too late once inside and they realize what's happened to them, and the ultimate price they will pay for not listening now. They would be far better off struggling to survive in the woods, even in the dead of winter, than to be held in a (death) camp.

In most all camps, all inmates will be supposedly "immunized" with vaccines. Those not immunized will know their time is short. But these "vaccines" will have hidden vicious pathogens, as inmates will be unwillingly inoculated with diseases and watched like lab rats. And when they become seriously ill nothing will be done to help them. To help them would most definitely interfere with the "science" being done to study the death and disease process taking place. After they die, their bodies will be collected and dissected like frogs in a grade school science lab. Think there are no more Dr. Mengelas in the world? Think again. There are more of them than ever before.

Remember how we began with Buffalo and cattle? In reality, it's entirely logical for keepers of the livestock to be cattle themselves. Just a different species. We have entered a new era like China, where human life has become a commodity. And the value of human life has reached an all-time low.

Witness a massive growth of fast track approved drugs like Nexium and hundreds of others ­ with deadly and crippling side effects sanctioned as safe with government approval. These drugs appear on the market, and after enough people DIE they just *might* be taken off the market. Just twenty five years ago drugs with long lists of side effects were unheard of. If a prescription drug had two or three side effects that was about all the FDA tolerated. Now data sheets on drugs go on for pages with cautions, warnings and other verbiage. A wise patient reads these sheets and knows when to shout NO! Now imagine what will happen to those unfortunate enough to be in POW camps, with no drug controls at all?

I stated several years ago in an older essay there would not be any further attacks on America unless the government does them. Why? Because the enemy everyone is preprogrammed to think exists everywhere does not exist at all. It's merely the classic scapegoat. If it did exist, the REAL truth is that any government would find it utterly impossible to stop. If there really was such a bad threat to America over the past 5 years, everything and everyone would have been destroyed by now. But the preprogramming of the masses has been nearly 100% effective. They believe every lie that flows forth from the video gods every day on their network news. Truly a sad, pathetic thing this is. But they are trapped in this paradigm, held in a jail of the mind encased with strong invisible bars. They constructed these bars as children, and parents unwittingly helped. They need help escaping ­ they need you to bring them a virtual hacksaw. YOU can't saw the bars of their invisible prison for them ­ they must do it themselves. But you can show them how one step at a time.

To borrow a line from the Good Book ­ "See the Lillies of the field. They toil not, neither do they spin." In reality these simple (?) flowers live to look pleasing to the eye and yet can withstand the most inclement weather, and still reproduce. Unlike the Buffalo or cattle which are unaware what the ventilated big tractor trailer box means to their futures, we CAN realize what's happening if we want to. There is no need to be a doormat for anyone else. Christians today often fail to realize that even Jesus Christ never taught that we should be doormats! Being a good doormat is something that 501-C3 churches endlessly teach the gullible. The Bible is considered to be perhaps the bloodiest book in history, as it shows that more blood was shed in the name of God than for any other reason in ancient times. Does this show that these ancient people were doormats?

Today, a soldier's blood is only shed in the name of an evil intention or plan, not for good. Yet so few people recognize this is happening. Millions have their Chinese-made magnetic signs which say "Support Our Troops" - but do they realize just what it is they are supporting? Must the troops stay over in that Mideast rat- hole to be blown up with our own explosives? Stay there and be made chronically sick and dying by radiation from our very own depleted uranium weaponry and mystery biologicals? Is THAT what supporting our troops means? Count me out. Even a blind man can see what's happening over there. Yet many with perfect vision cannot.

Thousands of people are waking up every day and there is hope. Helping others to accomplish their own paradigm shift is perhaps one of the noblest things anyone can do in their lifetime. Each person you help convert to the truth will want to share that good news with others, too. Imagine how this can multiply with simple binary progression! Not everyone we talk to will be receptive at this time. Many will stubbornly refuse to hear the truth now - but once the evil comes knocking at their door they too, will wake up. Even if by then it's too late to change things, they will still wake up. And your words will ring in their head over and over like the sound of a blacksmith hammering out horseshoes.

Educating others is not optional. Do not be ashamed to do it! For years I've put my actions where my mouth is. Though I'm far from perfect, would anyone have taken me seriously if I were to hide under a pen name? Because I've been so outspoken there are relatives who won't talk to me anymore. So be it, I don't care. My resolve is firm in what I stand for. Many in the world are just scared that what they have been warned about will come to pass. They are scared they might lose everything they have, or THINK they have. Deep inside they know the truth will shatter their comfortable little world they pretend to live in. Think only children play house? Think again. Adults do it all the time; just in a bigger, different way.

Forget all about "keeping up with the Jones'." To hell with waxing your car every weekend, mowing your lawn when it grows a quarter of an inch or buying the latest, biggest vehicle. What a waste of time and energy. Educating others is MANDATORY work for anyone who considers themselves as Americans, patriots or citizens. Outside of raising children, educating others is perhaps the most important work you will ever do. Mistakes will be made and perhaps even an enemy or two will be the result. So what! If the founding fathers were wimps and backed down like most people have been brainwashed into doing today ­ you and I would probably still be renting a pew from the King of England, and without doubt everyone would be speaking with a British accent and spelling color with a "u," and calling the hood of your car the "bonnet" and the car's trunk the "boot." Not to mention being taxed sky high and having video cameras in every conceivable place. Do we want to see this happen in America? It absolutely will if we just sit back and do nothing.

Nothing in life is risk free. Taking a shower entails the risk of having a fall. Many will convert more easily to the truth today than they would have just two years ago. Buying $4.00 gasoline has started many thinking about what's going on in their lives, and why. But in the end, inevitably every single person you reached out and touched and even those who laugh at you will one day find that everything you warned them about is real.

We MUST STAND UP for truth and that which is right in all times and in all places. Expose the evil which is already wreaking havoc in everyone's life today and the dark plans that evil leaders have made for the world of tomorrow. USE THE SYSTEM AGAINST ITSELF by showing what it's actually done to degrade life to where it is now. There is nothing more powerful than using the system against itself.

In past decades, when jobs were lost few people worried (except the unemployed.) Why? Because everyone knew the economy was cyclic, and new jobs would soon appear. Those days are gone because millions of jobs have been lost forever, all in the name of greed and power. Cursed are the MBA types who helped this happen. They see people as nothing more than a HUMAN RESOURCE to be used, chewed up and spit out. All of it is done in the name of profit which raises stock prices.

So who cares what people think about you, even if your teaching work doesn't go perfectly? Do you really live each day worrying what others think about you? I don't, and certainly hope you don't either. Forget about what they think! Don't waste time on it.

We're all in this together!

Damn the torpedoes and full steam ahead!

Ted Twietmeyer

As published at www.rense.com

Monday, May 28, 2007


Less Than 0.01% Of Homeland Security Cases Are Terrorism Related,
So why does the government say terrorism is DHS primary focus?

Steve Watson

Records obtained from the immigration courts under the Freedom of Information Act show that only 0.0015 percent of the total number of cases filed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security were terrorism related, despite the fact that the Bush administration has repeatedly asserted that it is the primary focus of the DHS.

A report issued Sunday by independent research group The Transactional Records Action Clearinghouse (TRAC) found that in the last three years there have only been 12 charges of terrorism out of 814,073 cases.

This once again highlights that the terrorist threat to America is vastly over hyped and is being used by a criminally controlled government as an excuse to police the world and foment a domestic police state to crush any dissent amongst the American people.

"The DHS claims it is focused on terrorism. Well that's just not true," David Burnham, a TRAC spokesman told CNN. "Either there's no terrorism, or they're terrible at catching them. Either way it's bad for all of us."
DHS spokesman Russ Knocke called the TRAC report "ill-conceived" and said the group "lacked a grasp of the DHS mission."

Knocke said that, by clamping down on all forms of immigration, DHS has made it difficult for terrorists to come to the United States.

Knocke's comments are clearly absurd as there are still millions of illegal immigrants pouring into the country every year and the borders remain wide open, the very reason why there is currently a heated debate over total immigration reform.

Even more revealing was the fact that the TRAC analysis also found that out of those 800,000 or so individuals charged only 114, or 0.014 percent of the total were charged with national security violations.

This re-emphasizes the fact that the Department of Homeland Security is nothing more than a bloated bureaucratic federal Octopus protruding its lawless tentacles into local government and policing. It has nothing to do with protecting America and everything to do with scaring it into total subjugation.

Earlier this month President Bush signed legislation which declares that in the event of a "catastrophic event", the President can take total control over the government and the country, bypassing all other levels of government, including Congress, and thus ensuring total unprecedented dictatorial power. A key part of this legislation places the Secretary of Homeland Security in charge of domestic "security".

When he announced the creation of a new Department of Homeland Security in 2002, President Bush invoked the fight against "terror" or "terrorists" 19 times in a single speech. Thus the word was used seven more times in one speech than there have been actual terrorism charges brought by the department in the last three years.

Should we be surprised that the DHS has nothing to do with terrorism? Quite frankly no, as we have tirelessly exposed the DHS track record of purely targeting innocent US citizens.

Since 9/11 the PATRIOT Act has been used in numerous cases involving American citizens, including strip club owners, toy store proprietors, the homeless, owners of websites, writers, internet users, artists, journalists and photographers.

Maybe in order to find more terrorists the DHS should investigate itself. In 2004 the DHS employed former East German Stasi head, the 'Silver Fox' Markus Wolfe who had previously been denied entry to the US as he was considered a terrorist. In addition, the DHS also hired Ex-head of the Soviet KGB, General Yevgeni Primakov.

What was it about their CVs that attracted the DHS?

Welcome to the new America.



How Can Bush Bring Freedom and Democracy to Iraq When He Brings Tyranny to America?
By Paul Craig Roberts

The Washington, DC, think-tank, The American Enterprise Institute, camouflages its purpose with its name. There is nothing American about AEI, and the organization’s enterprise is fomenting war in the Middle East against Israel’s enemies. Its real name should be The Likud Center for Middle East War. AEI has the largest collection of warmongers in America. AEI "scholars" have agitated for war in the Middle East for years. A moronic president and 9/11 gave them their opportunity. Now that the US invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan have failed, the AEI warmongers are conspiring with Vice President Cheney to foment war with Iran. Writing in The Washington Note, Steven C. Clemons reports that Cheney is working with the AEI warmongers to short-circuit the efforts of Bush’s secretaries of defense and state to find a diplomatic solution.

Clemons reports that one former high level national security official describes the Cheney-AEI conspiracy as possibly an act of "criminal insubordination" against President Bush. Now that the Democrats have betrayed their mandate of last November to end Bush’s war against Iraq and given Bush carte blanche to continue the gratuitous bloodshed, the neoconservative plan, spearheaded by Vice President Cheney, to initiate aggression against Iran is back on the front burner.

Disinformation is being fed to the media that Iran is responsible for attacks on US troops in Iraq. This disinformation is routinely reported without skepticism by the American media in the face of challenges from experts. For example, a recent British report concludes:
"few independent analysts believe Tehran is playing a decisive role in the sectarian warfare and insurgency."

While the Cheney/AEI conspirators strive to whip up American anger at Iran with lies and disinformation, they are doing everything possible to provoke Iran. The warmongers have planted the story in the media that the US is conducting covert operations against Iran. The US Navy is conducting "exercises" off Iran’s coast.

The US military in Iraq has violated diplomatic privilege and kidnapped Iranian officials in Iraq despite protests from the Iraqi and Iranian governments. The US government is stirring up more trouble in Lebanon by setting extremists Sunnis against Iran’s Hezbollah ally.

In short, the US government is doing everything possible to start a war with Iran. Bombing Iran, perhaps after a contrived "false flag" operation, is the next step. Bush continues to tell his favorite lies that he is bringing "freedom and democracy to Iraq" and that Muslims hate us because of our "freedom and democracy." He continues to make these inane assertions even as he ignores the will of the American people and destroys habeas corpus, the foundation of civil liberty.

Bush ignores the will of the people as expressed in last November’s congressional elections and as expressed in opinion polls. The New York Times/CBS News poll released May 24 shows another sharp drop in public support for Bush and his war. America is "seriously off on the wrong track" was the response of 72 percent of the public. President Bush, the Republican Party, and the Democratic Party have proved to the entire world that the American people have no voice. The American people have no more ability to affect their government’s policy than inmates in a gulag would have.

What do people in other countries think when they hear Bush prattle on about "freedom and democracy" while he ignores opinion polls and election results and detains people without warrants, tortures them, and puts them before military tribunals in which they are denied even knowing the evidence against them?

Bush has contrived a situation for defendants in which no defense is possible. In Bush’s America, people can be executed on the basis of hearsay and secret evidence. If this is "freedom and democracy," what is tyranny?

Recent polls show that the majority of the American people are no longer fooled, no matter what politicians say and media report. The election last November demonstrated the electorate's lack of support for continuing the war. The problem is in implementing the will of the people.

Democrats in Congress are not only recipients of AIPAC, oil industry, and military- security complex payoffs just as the Republicans are, Democrats are also behaving very cynically. They believe that it is Bush's policy that gave them control of Congress in November and that by continuing to let Bush prevail, they will clean up on a larger scale in 2008. They believe that their antiwar base has nowhere else to go. Their cynical logic is probably correct as far as it goes. Bush is being blamed for the war and its failure. The longer this goes on, the worse the situation for the Republicans.

Prior to Bush’s invasion of Iraq, I wrote in a column that the unintended consequences of an invasion would be the destruction of Bush, the Republican Party, and the conservative movement. It has taken longer than I thought, largely because of Americans’ blind desire for revenge for 9/11, but the prediction is on track. The problem with the Democrats’ cynical logic is that allowing Bush to prolong the war in Iraq increases the chances that Cheney, Israel, and the neoconservatives can contrive a war with Iran.

Most experts, and many in our own military, think that a war with Iran would go very badly for us, endangering our troops in Iraq by exposing them to more intense attacks from the more numerous Shiites, who would be armed with Iranian weapons that can neutralize our tanks and helicopters, leaving our fragmented and divided troops isolated and cut off from supplies and retreat routes. The pending disaster would play into Cheney's hands. With America faced with the loss of an army, Cheney and the neoconservatives would likely succeed in convincing Bush to nuke Iran.

Cheney and Rumsfeld have already changed US war doctrine to permit preemptive nuclear attack against non-nuclear powers. Surprised by the inability of the US military to prevail in Iraq and by Israel's military failure against Hezbollah, the neocons concluded that the only way to establish US/Israeli hegemony over the entire Middle East is to nuke Iran. The neocons believe that using nuclear weapons against Iran will demonstrate to the Muslim world that they have no alternative but to submit to US hegemony.

The Democrats are far from being alone in lacking the vision to see the abyss into which their cynicism is leading us. With the corporate media serving as propaganda ministry for the administration, Cheney will be able to whip up enough fear and anger to convince the American people that the use of nuclear weapons was imperative. Bush’s popularity will return as he prevails over the enemy and tells Americans how he saved them from Iran’s nuclear weapons. The Democrats’ cynicism will have destroyed them and opened new avenues to destruction and violence.



By Frosty Wooldridge

Senate Bill 1348, giving mass amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens, proves a treacherous and outrageous act against our civilization by Congress and President Bush.

"Every aspect of the current immigration bill, and of the arguments made for it, has fraud written all over it," said Dr. Thomas Sowell, African-American professor at Stanford University and writer for the San Gabriel Valley Tribune.

"What can we do with 12 million people already here illegally?" Sowell asked. "We can stop them from becoming 50 million, the way three million became 12 million from the previous amnesty in 1986."

Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation said, "This bill will add 103 million people into the United States in 20 years and cost American taxpayers $2.3 trillion."

Current demographic figures show the United States doubling its population from 300 million to 600 million via immigration. The ramifications of multiplying our current dilemmas double in every aspect of this civilization.

After the 20 million illegals become legalized, Z-visas add 400,000 workers annually forever.
S.B. 1348 presents amnesty for 636,000 deportee convicted criminal absconders ‘lost’ somewhere in America.

The amazing aspect of this bill reverses justice by enforcing amnesty for lawlessness while abdicating the rule of law. For example, over 15,000 MS-13 gang members become eligible for amnesty and eventual citizenship.
This amnesty undermines American citizens and legal immigrants from A to Z. It hijacks our electoral system by giving millions of illegal aliens the ability to vote in our local and national elections. They will vote for everything "Mexico" and against anything "American." This amnesty shoplifts America’s sovereignty out the door toward Third World Momentum.

Illegal aliens become eligible for college tuition subsidies in the Dream Act. At the same time, your tax dollars fund lawyers for illegal aliens. "Every illegal alien working in the agricultural sector would have access to an immigration attorney to argue his case through the immigration courts and federal courts of appeals—all at taxpayer expense," said Dr. Mathew Spalding of the Heritage Foundation.

"These Z-visas are nearly as good as non-provisional Z-visas, giving the alien immediate lawful status, protection from deportation, authorization to work, and the ability to exit and enter the country," said Kris Kobach, professor of law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City.

Bush touts this as a temporary guest worker program. Yes, and he would like to sell you a used car from the "Hood." But, what’s under the hood? Why after six years in office—after refusing to enforce our immigration laws—does he want to sell you a bogus ‘comprehensive immigration reform bill’?

John Boehner, former House Majority Leader, said, "I promised the President today that I wouldn’t say anything bad about...this piece of s**t bill." Mark Twain said, "Suppose you were an idiot; and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself."

Arch conservative Rush Limbaugh screamed that the amnesty bill spells disaster for America. Ann Coulter echoed Limbaugh. Next up, Bush lapdog Sean Hannity lamented that the amnesty bill proved a disaster for all Americans. Pat Buchanan, former U.S. presidential candidate, said, "This bill will be the death of America."

Other more rational minds, columnist George Will, Congressman Newt Gingrich, Fred Thompson, Tom Tancredo, William F. Buckley and Ed Meese oppose S.B. 1348.

Who supports it? Senator Teddy Kennedy, a man who never stepped foot into America in his life and knows nothing of the cultural carnage he heaped on America with his 1965 Immigration Reform Act and 1986 amnesty. God help America if we allow this village idiot of a man to drive the final nail into the coffin of our civilization in 2007.

Nothing about S.B. 1348 benefits America. It proves treachery against citizenship, the U.S. Constitution, lawful behavior and responsible migration. It transforms all immigration into the USA into a free-for-all.

Congress injects a syringe into America’s aorta and when Bush signs it, he pumps this nation into a future of Balkanization, accelerating imported poverty, displacement of America’s middle class and certain loss of the American Dream.

This bill ensures the end of America’s most cohesive aspect; its English language. Emanuel Kant said, "The two great dividers are religion and language."

"Under this bill, every immigrant is his own bubble of linguistic entitlement," says Jim Boulet Jr., executive director of English First. Thanks to President Bill Clinton's Executive Order 13166! As Sen. James Inhofe, R-OK, told the Senate, this is "an entitlement for a translator in any language you want other than English."

This bill proves Mark Twain’s lament when he said, "No man’s life, liberty or property is safe while the Congress is in session." Hard to fathom paying U.S. senators to enact quality bills—but, instead, we receive drivel. Their actions illustrate the "good of the country" comes second to power, greed and money. Nothing in this bill benefits American citizens!

But who become the biggest fools of all? Who will bequeath to their children a whirlwind of consequences as they uttered not one word while they did nothing to stop their country being ripped out from under them?

The great American ‘Silent Majority’! It’s the same majority that twiddled its thumbs while the Vietnam War slaughtered 58,000 of its sons and wounded 350,000 into lives of legless and armless despair. They watched while three million Vietnamese suffered horrible deaths from napalm, bombs and Agent Orange. What a horrific tragedy for humanity! All of it based on the lie of the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution" by Lyndon Baines Johnson!

That same ‘Silent Majority’ sits by while George Bush slaughters 3,440, and counting, U.S. combat soldiers and 24,000 wounded young American men and women in Iraq pretending to pursue a "War on Terror" while he leaves our borders stark raving open to any terrorist crossing in the dead of night. Bush killed, according to the Johns Hopkins Report, 655,000 Iraqi civilians. He’s dropped depleted uranium bombs that cause birth defects in Iraqis for generations while poisoning our own soldiers. He based his war on the bald faced lie of "Weapons of Mass Destruction."

If the "Silent Majority" sits idly by on this S.B 1348, neither the United States of America nor the "American Dream" will survive the sheer population numbers of adding 100 million people, let alone the Balkanization, conflicting languages, diseases, crime and poverty of this advancing "Human Katrina."What you can do for a better future for your country:

A republican form of government is not a spectator sport. It means you must jump in, roll up you sleeves and take personal and collective action. Of course, you could let a dictator take over and do everything for you, but that path would give you Cuba, China, North Korea and other unsavory examples.

To stop Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid from giving an amnesty, take action. Call for a full 10 year moratorium.

Washington, DC - (202) 225-4965 S
an Francisco, CA - (415) 556-4862

Senator Harry Reid
202-224-3121 in Washington DC
775-686-5750 in Reno, NV

George Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20500
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard for live listener: 202 456 1414
Fax: 202-456-2461
© 2007 Frosty Wooldridge - All Rights Reserved

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

9/11 PROOF

9/11 Debunkers Hide From Slam Dunk Evidence Of Controlled Demolition
Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site proves thermate, proves collapse of twin towers was an act of deliberate arson

Paul Joseph WatsonPrison Planet

Professor Steven Jones presented brand new and compelling evidence for the controlled demolition of the twin towers and WTC 7 recently, but the 9/11 debunkers and the corporate media are loathe to tackle it because it represents a slam dunk on proving the collapse of the buildings was a deliberate act of arson.

During a talk at the Rebuilding America's Senses event at the University of Texas last month, Jones laid out facts about steel samples recovered from the WTC site that Popular Mechanics dare not even attempt to debate. Debunkers are scared to even get near this information because the science behind it fundamentally contradicts the official story of what happened on 9/11.

Jones detailed his lab experiments in which he attempted to replicate NIST's conclusion that the lava like orange material flowing out of the south tower is aluminum from Flight 175, the plane that hit the building. Jones clearly documents the fact that liquid aluminum is silver and not orange as is seen in the video of the south tower, therefore the material cannot be aluminum. Jones then explains that the material is in fact a compound that can cut through steel like a hot knife through butter, thermite with sulphur added to make thermate.

The crux of the fresh evidence revolves around newly uncovered globules or spheres that were discovered at the WTC site that Professor Jones was able to obtain and run a electron microscope analysis on. The spheres contained iron and aluminum, which would be expected in any steel sample, but also sulphur which is a by-product of a thermate reaction.

So having moved from a hypothesis that thermate was used to bring down the towers from using video footage and debunking the aluminum explanation of NIST, Jones now has empirical scientific proof, undertaken under laboratory conditions, that thermate was indeed used as an artificial explosive at the World Trade Center. It has now been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the collapse of the twin towers and WTC 7 was an act of deliberate arson and not as a result of fires from crashing planes.

Jones' evidence offers no other conclusion that insiders planted thermite devices within the buildings to literally pulverize the supporting columns and cause the collapse of the towers and also WTC 7. Debunkers have uniformly failed to address the existence of thermite and also molten metal at the ground zero site because they cannot dismiss the scientific proof, and are forced to resort to ad hominem insults and smears.

We are issuing a challenge to Popular Mechanics to rebut Professor Jones' analysis of the sphere samples and the clear evidence of thermate at the World Trade Center. Address the focused scientific proof without resorting to ad hominem attacks or straying off topic.

We don't expect the progenitors of yellow journalism to have any answers for what constitutes the smoking gun of controlled demolition.


Monday, May 21, 2007



By Darren Weeks

We are told that over-population is the greatest threat facing planet earth. Daily, we are given lectures of how we humans are screwing up the environment, damaging the earth’s “fragile” eco-system, killing the birds, and polluting the air and water. Forked-tongued politicians, finger-wagging bureaucrats, and a choir of “green” organizations moan an off-key chorus of alarm about the human “footprint” on earth.

We are blamed for over-fishing the seas, deforestation of wooded areas, droughts and desertification, wildfires and floods. We cause congestion in the cities, sprawl in the suburbs, and terrorize the creatures in the countryside. It is obvious from what we’re told, Americans have no place in the world and the world is better off without us.

We drive too much, eat too much, breathe too much and throw away too much. We are living too large, we take up too much space, we are too rich, we’ve become too fat, and we have too many children.

Every day, and in every way, we are evil. We kill, we destroy, we pollute, we intrude. We are the scourge of “Mother Earth”, and the warts on Gaia’s backside.

This is the message that is being declared from the halls of government, academia, tax-exempt foundations, and the Establishment-controlled media. Never before has it ever been clearer that not only are we unfit stewards of the land and its natural resources, we literally are not worthy to breathe the air.

As a matter of fact, with the recent Supreme Court decision that declared carbon dioxide a “pollutant” that must be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency, we are officially damaging the planet by doing nothing else than breathing.

At the same time the venom of elite-driven hatred spews forth from every channel of propaganda, we have bacteria being added to our lunch meat and fluoride added to our water supply. We have foreign substances being sprayed in our skies, and genetically-modified crops producing their own pesticides for our consumption. Our vitamins and nutritional supplements are being eliminated in favor of a limitless bombardment of toxin-infested vaccines and mandated pharmaceutical drugs. [Read the book "Fluoride Deception"]

Our farmers and ranchers have been molested for years by endless regulations, land-use and irrigation restrictions, and have, for decades, been paid not to produce. As domestic food production has dropped, foreign food imports have risen, along with sicknesses, food poisonings and contaminations.

It is high time that every American begin to make the connection between the demonization of all normal human activity, versus the daily and ongoing attacks on our food, our water, our vitamins, on all of the basic staples that we need to sustain our lives.

Upon careful examination of the evidence, it is difficult to escape the reality that we are gradually and deliberately being made victims of a mass genocide. The necessary pieces are being placed together to eliminate a large number of the population.

In an April 16th Associated Press article headlined, Imported Food Rarely Inspected, it said,
“Just 1.3 percent of imported fish, vegetables, fruit and other foods are inspected — yet those government inspections regularly reveal food unfit for human consumption.”

On April 23rd, the Associated Press ran a follow-up article headlined, U.S. Food Safety Strained by Imports. The article said,

“The same food safety net that couldn't catch poisoned pet food ingredients from China has a much bigger hole.

“Billions of dollars’ worth of foreign ingredients that Americans eat in everything from salad dressing to ice cream get a pass from overwhelmed inspectors, despite a rising tide of imports from countries with spotty records, according to an Associated Press analysis of federal trade and food data.

“When U.S. Food and Drug Administration inspectors at ports and border checkpoints look, they find shipments that are filthy or otherwise contaminated. They rarely bother, however, in part because ingredients aren't a priority.”

How does that make you feel America? Your very own mainstream news media is telling you that you are eating trash! Your government is aware of the problem. In fact, they created the problem by persecuting domestic food producers at every turn, and forcing family farm owners out of business. In the vacuum, massive multi-national corporations and foreign producers have stepped up production to feed you and almost none of their products are inspected. It isn’t a priority. Why? [See Vedeo "Future of Food"]

Could it be that the answer lies in the fact that they keep telling us that over-population is a problem? Could it be that the real movers and shakers behind public policy in America consider you a liability to their environment, to their power base, and to their world Order?

The truth is that those who hold the reigns of power consider this planet theirs. The air you breathe, the water you drink, the land you think you own — it’s all theirs! That’s why you’ll pay to use it all. And make no mistake about it, taxes upon your carbon emissions are right around the corner. They will charge you to use the air because you’re a liability to their planet, simply because you’re alive. They place themselves in the position of the Almighty, and they’ve decided that you don’t belong here.

This principle is demonstrated with unequaled clarity at the Church of Euthanasia website, where their motto is “Save the planet, kill yourself.” This non-profit foundation promotes what they refer to as their “four pillars” — suicide, abortion, cannibalism, and sodomy. Their one commandment is, “thou shalt not procreate.” Although they say their purpose is to restore “balance between humans and the remaining species on earth,” they glorify death, encourage suicide and have even hosted instructions on how to commit suicide.

Though much less diplomatic in their choice of language, the Church of Euthanasia’s ideology is harmonious to the United Nations Environment Programme’s Agenda 21 initiatives that are being implemented all across America and around the world. Though the UN is much more careful to disguise it’s people-hating agenda with pretty terms such as “human rights”, “walkable communities”, “Smart Growth”, “New Urbanism”, “Cool Cities”, “Scenic Byways”, and “conservation easements”, the outcome is the same. The plans that are being implemented around the country and the world are designed to crush human activity, put the means of production off limits to you, and to stop human “sprawl” — meaning, people living any place they decide you shouldn’t.

Americans must quickly awaken and realize that there is a silent and undeclared war upon our freedom, our health, and our very existence. Quietly, and behind the scenes in secret meetings, these people haters are plotting to remove every support needed to sustain life.

In 1972, the Rockefeller Commission on Population and the American Future was commissioned by President Richard Nixon. The commission, which was chaired by John D. Rockefeller III, lamented the prospect of “one of the most serious challenges” facing America. They outlined three “positions” that needed to be addressed as population policy, which included greater access to contraceptives and “fertility control,” the promotion of “equal rights” for women and minorities — getting them busy in careers so they aren’t tempted to have children — and finally a reshaping of American values to harmonize them with environmental conservation. Of the last point, the commission writes,

“The third position deals with the population problem in an ecological framework, one whose primary axiom asserts the functional interdependence of man and his environment. It calls for a far more fundamental shift in the operative values of modern society. The need for more education and knowledge and the need to eliminate poverty and racism are important, but not enough. For the population problem, and the growth ethic with which it is intimately connected, reflect deeper external conditions and more fundamental political, economic, and philosophical values. Consequently, to improve the quality of our existence while slowing growth, will require nothing less than a basic recasting of American values.”

It is this “recasting of American values” that is precisely what attorney and environmental activist Daniel Sitarz, the author of the authoritative version of Agenda 21, referred to when in 1992, at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, he stated:

“Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced — a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level. There are specific actions which are intended to be undertaken by multinational corporations and entrepreneurs, by financial institutions and individual investors, by high-tech companies and indigenous people, by workers and labor unions, by farmers and consumers, by students and schools, by governments and legislators, by scientists, by women, by children — in short, by every person on Earth.”

To put it another way, Sitarz is saying that there is no single person on the planet that won’t be effected by the implementation of Agenda 21. He chooses words such as “profound reorientation”, “major shift” and “unprecedented” to describe their own agenda! Does this not sound a little revolutionary?

At this point, one must ask the question, who gave these people the mandate to reshape society and “recast” our values toward the principles of “sustainability” and Agenda 21? What right do they have to tell us how and where to live, how much water to use, what we can and cannot eat, and what to do with our own property?

The answer is, of course, we did. We’ve been so pacified with TV, movies, celebrity worship, video games, gossip magazines, and a million other things that accomplish nothing, that we have not fulfilled our duties to govern our country. Now, we don’t like the results of leaving the process of government to the professionals. The truth of the matter is that we are living the consequences of our own acquiescence. We are reaping what we’ve sewn, and we are now being targeted for extermination.

Quoting again from the Rockefeller Commission,

“Population growth is one of the major factors affecting the demand for resources and the deterioration of the environment in the United States. The further we look into the future, the more important population becomes. From an environmental and resource point of view, there are no advantages from further growth of population beyond the level to which our past rapid growth has already committed us. Indeed, we would be considerably better off over the next 30 to 50 years if there were a prompt reduction in our population growth rate. This is especially true with regard to problems of water, agricultural land, and outdoor recreation. While the nation can, if it has to, find ways to solve the problems growth creates, we will not like some of the solutions we will have to adopt.”

To what potential solutions could Rockefeller and his cohorts on the commission have been referring? Could it have been the massive depopulation efforts that we are currently experiencing in the 21st century? Could they have been eluding to the poisoning of our air, water, and food supply? Could it have been the limitless wars, and orchestrated acts of terrorism? Perhaps, it was pre-born infanticide that they were referencing, as we’ve murdered over a million unborn children a year since the Supreme Court made its ruling on abortion the year after Rockefeller’s report on population was issued.

Chapter 5 of United Nations’ Agenda 21 says it this way,

“The growth of world population and production combined with unsustainable consumption patterns places increasingly severe stress on the life-supporting capacities of our planet. These interactive processes affect the use of land, water, air, energy and other resources. Rapidly growing cities, unless well-managed, face major environmental problems. The increase in both the number and size of cities calls for greater attention to issues of local government and municipal management. The human dimensions are key elements to consider in this intricate set of relationships and they should be adequately taken into consideration in comprehensive policies for sustainable development. … Population policy should also recognize the role played by human beings in environmental and development concerns. There is a need to increase awareness of this issue among decision makers at all levels and to provide both better information on which to base national and international policies and a framework against which to interpret this information.”

What are the specific details of the “population policies” inherent in Agenda 21? How is it that Amer
ica was never told about this program to organize and/or eliminate life on planet earth?

The truth is that we’re not supposed to know because if the great unwashed were made aware of the plans to control every aspect of their lives, and to kill off a major portion of their numbers, they might find it somewhat objectionable.

The radical environmentalists, once on the fringe of extremist groups, have now been institutionalized into every area of governance, academia, and law, from the United Nations on down. And you and your children are targeted for mass extinction.

To those who care, you are implored to educate yourself and then become involved in the fight to stop this agenda, at a local level where the plans are being implemented.

And to those radical environmentalists who truly believe the planet would be better served if there were less humans living here, you should lead by example. The rest of us might find, after you’re gone, that you were right.

© 2007 Darren Weeks - All Rights Reserved


By Steven Yates

Ron Paul now has national visibility, courtesy of last Tuesday’s “debate” down in Columbia—much to the chagrin of mainstream media and Republican Party elites. His poll numbers are sufficiently high that a struggle to suppress them is underway. We are seeing what we might call a Ron Paul rebellion. Whether it will have staying power remains to be seen.

This was the exchange that opened the door. Fox New’s Wendell Goler addressed Paul and asked, “I believe you are the only man on the stage who opposes the war in Iraq, who would bring the troops home as quickly as— almost immediately, sir. Are you out of step with your Party? Is your Party out of step with the rest of the world? If either of those is the case, why are you seeking its nomination?”

Ron Paul articulated, “Well, I think the Party has lost its way, because the conservative wing of the Republican Party always advocated a non-interventionist foreign policy. Senator Robert Taft didn’t even want to be in NATO. George Bush won the election in the year 2000 campaigning on a humble foreign policy—no nation-building, no policing of the world. Republicans were elected to end the Korean War. The Republicans were elected to end the Vietnam War. There’s a strong tradition of being anti-war in the Republican Party. It is the Constitutional position. It is the advice of the Founders to follow a non-interventionist foreign policy, stay out of entangling alliances, be friends with countries, negotiate and talk with them and trade with them…. [T]here’s a lot of merit to the advice of the Founders and following the Constitution. And my argument is that we shouldn’t go to war so carelessly.”

Goler followed up with, “Congressman, you don’t think that changed with the 9/11 attacks, sir?”

His response: our foreign policy was a “major contributing factor. Have you ever read the reasons they attacked us? They attack us because we’ve been over there; we’ve been bombing Iraq for 10 years. We’ve been in the Middle East—I think Reagan was right. We don’t understand the irrationality of Middle Eastern politics. So right now we’re building an embassy in Iraq that’s bigger than the Vatican. We’ve building 14 permanent bases. What would we say here if China was doing this in our country or in the Gulf of Mexico? We would be objecting. We need to look at what we do from the perspective of what would happen if somebody else did it to us.”

Goler: “Are you suggested we invited the 9/11 attacks, sir?”

“I’m suggesting that we listen to the people who attacked us and the reason they did it, and they are delighted that we’re over there because Osama bin Laden has said, ‘I am glad you’re over on our sand because we can target you so much easier.’ They have already now since that time have killed 3,400 of our men, and I don’t think it was necessary.”

That was when Rudy Giuliani blew his top—giving this writer the best reason I’ve seen not to vote for him and to urge others not to support him. Giuliani jumped in with, “That’s really an extraordinary statement. As someone who lived through the attack of September 11, that we invited the attack because we were attacking Iraq. I don’t think I’ve heard that before, and I’ve heard some pretty absurd explanations for September 11th. I would ask the Congressman to withdraw that comment and tell us that he didn’t really mean that.” Delivered with the tone of a true authoritarian. An overwhelmingly neocon audience cheered.

Paul hadn’t said we invited 9/11, of course. He used the phrase contributing factor, which implies there were other contributing factors. When asked to reply, he elaborated:

“I believe very sincerely that the CIA is correct when they teach and talk about blowback. When we went into Iran in 1953 and installed the Shah, yes, there was blowback. A reaction to that was the taking of our hostages and that persists. And if we ignore that, we ignore that at our own risk. If we think that we can do what we want around the world and not incite hatred, then we have a problem. They don’t come here to attack us because we’re rich and we’re free. They come and they attack us because we’re over there. I mean, what would we think if we were—if other foreign countries were doing that to us?”

We saw, dramatized on national television and in ensuing media discussion, the two worldviews that may battle it out over the next year or so for control of the Republican Party—and possibly the country itself—with ramifications well beyond Election 2008. The one Rudy Giuliani represents (which is that of the Bush clan, the neocons, and the corporatist elite generally): the U.S. is an empire obliged or destined to rule the world, capable of building “democracies” in the Middle East and perhaps elsewhere, relying on a value system based on money and power. Power does not necessarily corrupt. We peons should fall in line behind our leaders.

The second, which Ron Paul represents, sees the U.S. as a Constitutional republic with a limited government, believes that sound economics requires sound money (not our present fiat dollar), would distinguish genuine free enterprise from corporatism, and advocate a foreign policy of trade with all but entangling alliances with none—i.e., a foreign policy rooted in respect for other nations’ sovereignty and their right to self-determination. Other nations’ internal affairs are not our business unless we are explicitly invited in.

This is not simply a clash between “left” and “right,” or between “liberal” and “conservative.” We may be approaching a major dust-up between those who want freedom and those who want power, between those who believe society must be aggressively centralized and those who wish to see power dispersed. We may see a struggle between those who want policies that allow the common man to live as he sees fit if he isn’t bothering anyone else, and a cadre of oligarchs who view the world as theirs, and who see themselves as unaccountable.

The Republican National Committee and its talk-show fellow travelers are all on the side of power. The latter immediately went into attack-dog mode. After the debate, Paul appeared on Fox News’s Hannity & Colmes show. Sean Hannity spluttered incoherently against Paul to the point where Paul had difficulty getting a word in edgewise; to his credit, he did not get flustered and refused to back down. He stood his ground the next day when Wolf Blitzer on CNN asked if he wanted to apologize for his statements. He retorted that Rudy Giuliani ought to apologize to him. He told Blitzer that Americans have the right to disagree with bad policy.

Interventionism is bad foreign policy, he said, and ought to be challenged. Fox News anchor John Gibson tried to associate Paul with the 9/11 Truth movement by crediting Paul with saying “the U.S. actually had a hand in the terrorist attacks.” Paul, of course, had said nothing of the sort. Glenn Beck, yet another neocon talk-show host and Rush Limbaugh wannabe, has repeatedly smeared Paul on his show, calling him “crazy” after the first debate and a “dope” after this one.

Michigan Republican Party Chair Saul Anuzis proposed barring Ron Paul from future debates. After the RNC and the Michigan GOP received thousands of phone calls and several online petitions totaling over 20,000 signatures, they scrapped that idea. We may thank the growing number of people who get their news over the uncensored Internet, where Ron Paul is now practically the frontrunner, for protecting free speech from Republican Party elites.

Ron Paul’s point of view is gaining an audience whether the neocons like it or not. Major CNN contributing writer Roland S. Martin has said that his thinking on U.S. foreign policy should at least be discussed. Paul, after all, is hardly the first to say that our policies in the Middle East might have contributed to our being attacked. Jacob G. Hornberger, of the Future of Freedom Foundation, in fact has a detailed timeline of our interventions in the region going back to 1953, the year a CIA-backed coup in Iran ousted democratically elected Mohammed Mosadegh and instilled the Shah. As the Shah proceeded to butcher the Iranian people for the next quarter-century, the Islamic terror underground formed and began to ferment (see Hornberger’s article “Iraq, Iran and September 11: A Chronology,”

But more generally, the Ron Paul candidacy is exposing how the power system in this country is gutting the Constitution. This is very good news! Ron Paul has arguably won two national debates now—won in the sense that he came from the incredible disadvantage of a media blackout and has reached the point of having a message that is resonating with that growing segment of the public that is fed up with government lies, whether the topic is Iraq, illegal immigration, the economy, or any number of other front burner issues.

Giuliani looks to be emerging as the elites’ favorite. This guy is pro-choice, favors special rights for gays, and advocates gun control. Have these become official Republican positions, and are they evidence of what has happened to the Republican Party since the neocons took it over? An attorney friend of mine with whom I spoke last Friday probably said it best. To paraphrase how he put it, if the Republicans choose Rudy Giuliani as their nominee after a protracted hate campaign drives Ron Paul back to “third party” status and the public lets them get away with it, they do not deserve to win next year. It will be fair and just to say that this country deserves a socialist Hillary/Obama presidency which would run Rome on the Potomac straight into the ground.

It might be worth noting as an aside that Giuliani has been linked to the proposed NAFTA Superhighway system. According to the Texas Department of Transportation, his Houston-based law firm, Bracewell & Guiliani, represents Cintra Concesiones, the Spanish megacorporation that has joined with San Antonio’s Zachry Construction on the Trans-Texas Corridor. This positions Giuliani firmly with the power elite. So again: do Americans really want him in the White House?

And should conservatives trust information from elite-controlled outfits like Fox News (owned by News Corporation, globalist Rupert Murdoch’s media empire)? Arguably the exchange between Ron Paul and Rudy Giuliani was a set-up. During debates such as the one last Tuesday, microphones of non-speakers are turned off. Giuliani’s, however, was left on while Ron Paul was speaking. Why? Was someone waiting for something Giuliani could attack? Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media has observed, “[Fox News] seems to be emerging as an arm of the Giuliani-for-President campaign. Honest conservatives should demand better coverage.” Fox News Online published a dishonest Dick Morris column declining to mention Paul and portraying the race as “nine-way.”

A growing number of people aren’t buying it. They are responding to Ron Paul’s message of limited government, bringing America’s troops home from a pointless and increasingly destructive war, abolishing the IRS and the Federal Reserve, getting out of bad trade agreements like NAFTA and CAFTA, getting out of the WTO, restoring the Constitution, and returning to the idea of America as republic, not empire. It would be, as I’ve noted elsewhere, a first. But those who believe that America is still worth fighting for will get behind Ron Paul’s candidacy, and defend him from the media’s attack dogs. Since Ron Paul shows no signs of caving in, and I don’t see the neocons backing down, the next year promises to be very interesting!
© 2007 Steven Yates - All Rights Reserved

Steven Yates earned his Ph.D. in Philosophy in 1987 at the University of Georgia and has taught the subject at a number of colleges and universities around the Southeast. He currently teaches philosophy at the University of South Carolina Upstate and Greenville Technical College, and also does a little e-commerce involving real free trade. He is on the South Carolina Board of The Citizens Committee to Stop the FTAA.
He is the author of Civil Wrongs: What Went Wrong With Affirmative Action (1994), Worldviews: Christian Theism Versus Modern Materialism (2005), around two dozen philosophical articles and reviews in refereed journals and anthologies, and over a hundred articles on the World Wide Web. He lives in Greenville, South Carolina, where he writes a weekly column for the Times Examiner and is at work on a book length version of his popular series to be entitled The Real Matrix (hopefully!) to be completed this summer.

E-Mail: freeyourmindinsc@yahoo.com.

Thursday, May 17, 2007


This is sick:

Unborn babies targeted in crackdown on criminality
Blair launches policy imported from US to intervene during pregnancy to head off antisocial behaviour
Lucy Ward, social affairs correspondent
The Guardian

Women can be identified for help just 16 weeks after conceiving.

Unborn babies judged to be at most risk of social exclusion and turning to criminality are to be targeted in a controversial new scheme to be promoted by Downing Street today.

In an effort to intervene as early as possible in troubled families, first-time mothers identified just 16 weeks after conception will be given intensive weekly support from midwives and health visitors until the unborn child reaches two years old.

Unveiling the findings of a Downing Street review, Tony Blair will make clear the government is prepared to single out babies still in the womb to break cycles of deprivation and behaviour.

He will also acknowledge that the state must do more to help a minority of families and will stress that the support they need cannot come through the promotion of marriage.

In an attempt to draw a clear division between Labour and the Conservatives Mr Blair will say that making marriage the primary focus of family policy will be ineffective and could lead to discrimination against children whose parents have split up or died.

The Nurse Family Partnership programme is the most striking attempt yet to pre-empt problems.
Downing Street will outline today how a £7m pilot scheme has already begun to recruit the first of 1,000 families in 10 areas in England.

Supporters of the policy say the risk of stigmatising unborn infants as potential future victims or troublemakers is outweighed by the advantages of helping poor families build on the aspirations they have for their children.

Under the programme, which has been copied from the United States, young, first-time mothers will be assigned a personal health visitor at between 16 and 20 weeks into their pregnancy. They will continue to have weekly or fortnightly visits until the child is two - far more than the few postnatal visits generally on offer.

The support includes help with giving up smoking or drug use in pregnancy, followed by a focus on bonding with the new baby, understanding behaviour such as crying, and encouraging a mother to develop her skills and resources to be a good parent. The programme is voluntary and the intention is to capitalise on the so-called "magic moment" when parents are receptive to support for themselves and their baby.

In the US, three large trials have seen consistently positive results, including higher IQ levels and language development in children, lower levels of abuse, neglect and child injuries in families, and improvements in the antenatal health and job prospects of mothers.

Proponents of the scheme, pioneered by the American paediatrician Professor David Olds, also point to the long-term cost savings, estimated at almost $25,000 (£12,500) by the time a child is 30.

The decision to target unborn babies is, in effect, an acknowledgement by Mr Blair that the government's focus on tackling social exclusion has left a hardcore - 2-3% - of the most excluded families behind.

The prime minister's introduction to today's family review says the state must help such children out of fairness, and because "some of these families actually cause wider social harms. The community in which they live suffers the consequences".

Kate Billingham, director of the project and deputy chief nursing officer, rejected suggestions the scheme could stigmatise deprived children. "I myself think labelling and stigmatising are used as ways of not giving people the help they want and their children can benefit from."

At a Downing Street breakfast to launch the policy this morning, Mr Blair will meet expectant mothers recruited to the scheme, as well as Professor Olds, its founder. Prof Olds told the Guardian the key to the scheme was its ability to "tap into" the instincts of parents. "We are wired as human beings to protect our children," he said.

It was possible that the UK's "superior health care system and social services" compared with the US could result in the relative benefits of the scheme here being smaller than the significant impact seen in American trials, he warned.

While the scheme is generally backed by children and parenting campaigners in the UK, concerns have been raised that the new focus on intensive help for excluded families could drain resources away from already overstretched health visiting services.

A spokeswoman for the Family and Parenting Institute said: "We very much welcome the health-led parenting projects, but they are only for a tiny proportion of the population and we think that a strong universal offer is critical for the majority of families who also need support and parenting help from health visitors.

"The problem is that the number of health visitors is falling - and there are massive variations in numbers throughout the country."

Thats right, the government will be knocking on your door soon to take over responsibility of your criminal unborn child. Yes, government; What should we eat? What should we think? How should we act and behave? Please tell me, what books should I read? How should I raise my children? Please tell me how to live?

Spooky, very spooky!!!

Wednesday, May 16, 2007



Faculty fakes gunman attack on crying 6th graders

A teacher and assistant principal at a Tennessee elementary school staged a fake gun attack on frightened students during a class trip, sparking outrage among parents, according to a report from CNN's Newsroom.

According to school board member Lon Nuell, the prank was poorly timed. "Ghost stories are standard, and you scare the kids out of their wits," said Nuell. "But this was very unfortunate timing, if the timing would ever be good for this sort of thing, this was not it," referring to the Virginia Tech shootings that killed 33 students and professors in April.

According to one student who participated in the trip, Dalton Brown, the assistant principal instructed the students to get under desks and said that they had a "code red" – reserved for when an individual is in possession of a gun, knife, or bomb. The school later issued a press release classifying the events as a "typical campfire prank." According to Brown's mother, the prank crossed the line.

"It's just appalling that they would classify this as such a thing, because there's nothing typical about what they did to our children," said Brown. "The kids were underneath tables crying and praying to God and begging for their lives, thinking that they were gonna die and that they were never going to see their families again ."


Monday, May 14, 2007


By Darren Weeks

"Along with this came a bit of a scolding that Americans had it too good anyway and just a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans that the world is indeed a dangerous place... or can be if we don't relinquish control to the proper authorities." — The New Order of the Barbarians[1]

The date was September 11th, as President Bush stood before a joint session of Congress, and, by television, the nation. A fresh wind of patriotism had swept the country from sea to shining sea, as the Bush administration had begun a military operation against Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. As he spoke, the President’s comments were repeatedly interrupted by applause from both sides of the political aisle.

"If there ever was a time to put country before self and patriotism before party, the time is now ... We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective, a new world order, can emerge: a new era — freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we've known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. This is the vision that I shared with President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and other leaders from Europe, the Gulf, and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come."[2] (Emphasis added)

The date was September 11, 1990. And the President was George Herbert Walker Bush, the 41st President of the United States. The crisis of which he spoke, was the first Gulf War.

The "opportunity" that he so eagerly hoped to seize, was the building of a "new world order," the globalists’ phrase for a world-wide socialist system that defines "freedom" and "democracy" as a socialist-communitarian system. It is in this system that individual liberties, or "the law of the jungle," are supplanted by "the rule of law" — a totalitarian police state.

It is the undying dream of every socialist throughout the history of mankind. A society where "freedom" and "liberty" mean the freedom and liberty to do as your government tells you, without question or dissention of any kind. Theirs is a world where participation in the governmental process is at the behest of those in power. And individual liberties — real liberties — are dissolved in favor of the well-being of the whole "community."
Property and privacy are forcefully surrendered to the protection of a "secure" nanny state — that is, secure until the "protector" becomes the aggressor. Indeed, it is as Bush said, "a world quite different from the one we've known." Is it any wonder why former Soviet leader and unrepentant communist Mikhail Gorbachev shared Bush’s vision in Helsinki?

As Bush Sr. spoke on that day, the plans were already being drawn for a second Iraqi invasion, a second and final war that would put the final pieces of the plan for world conquest into place.

As the twin towers of the World Trade Center collapsed, eleven years later to the day of that speech, the arrival of yet another "opportunity" would emerge. It would be another era, another Bush administration, a myriad of Mohammads, and another undeclared war.

This time, it was British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, who spoke of how marvelous an "opportunity" that the purported "attack" presented.

In an October 2, 2001 speech that The Guardian called "the most powerful speech of his career," Blair couldn’t contain his enthusiasm. Excitedly, he expounded upon his desire to use the corpses of the victims, as an "opportunity" to reorder the world, and build a world "community."
Blair said,

"This is a moment to seize. The Kaleidoscope has been shaken. The pieces are in flux. Soon they will settle again. Before they do, let us reorder this world around us. Today, humankind has the science and technology to destroy itself or to provide prosperity to all. Yet science can't make that choice for us. Only the moral power of a world acting as a community, can."[3]

Prosperity for all! A chicken in every pot! Thus, are the rallying cries of the socialists, to sell their plan to the naive and uneducated masses. It is the age-old promise of those in power, that if you give them the chance to direct your lives, they will provide prosperity for everyone.

Never mind the fact that this is the promise of communism, which has plunged every nation into poverty that has ever tried it. Never mind the turmoil, misery, and outright pauperism it has caused to the great unwashed, who have suffered under its iron fist. Never mind the lives that have to be destroyed in the process of putting the Plan into fruition.

Their Plan is the end, and to them, the end justifies the means. Their means is crisis upon crisis, manipulating the population through endless wars, killings, and orchestrated terrorism, designer diseases and pandemics, famine and starvation, floods, droughts and other anomalous disasters precipitated by weather manipulation.
The global would-be despots, by their own words, never see human suffering of any kind as a true tragedy. Whenever adversity strikes, they will always see it as an "opportunity" for change. Crises serve as proper conditioning mechanisms, whereby human minds can be made fertile with new ideas that would ordinarily be rejected. It’s called the Hegelian dialectic, and it is the vehicle by which society is moved toward a predetermined outcome.

When anguish prevails due to a catastrophe that extinguishes the light of human life, these Luciferians gleefully gather like hungry vultures to capitalize upon it for the furtherance of their agenda. While average Americans are attending to every detail of their busy lives, the Establishment planners are never distracted. Day and night, they are constantly at work, toiling away at the next big event, planning more scenarios, creating for themselves more "opportunities."

In 1997, then Defense Secretary, William Cohen, hinted at what "opportunities" lie ahead. In a September 10th interview with the Army Times, Cohen predicted:

"Terrorism is escalating to the point that Americans soon may have to choose between civil liberties and more intrusive means of protection."

He went on to describe an America that would include armored vehicles surrounding civilian hotels or government buildings. And the Posse Comitatus law — which prevents the government from using the military in domestic law-enforcement roles — would be revoked. Mr. Cohen was describing the agenda for the Office of Homeland Security, Total Information Awareness and the U.S.A. Patriot Act — key elements of the effort to establish an Orwellian communitarian police state in America.

With the signing of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act by President Bush in October 2006, Public Law 109-364 has now effectively gutted the Posse Comitatus law[4], just as William Cohen said would happen. How did he know?

The agenda to move America into a totalitarian system, began with the creation of an atmosphere of fear in America, caused by a purported act of terrorism. Then, when the public mindset was properly conditioned with the fertilizer of fear, the seed would be planted in their minds that their liberty would have to be forfeited in favor of their security.

This agenda was covertly referenced by Henry Kissinger in a Bilderberg Conference in Evians, France in 1991. According to one of the Swiss delegates, Kissinger stated:

"Today, Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true, if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond — whether real or promulgated — that threatened our very existence. It is then that all the peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing that every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished with the guarantee of their well-being, granted to them by their world government."

Kissinger was saying that "crisis equals opportunity." Upon the foundation of created chaos, they can build their new "Order."

Once world government is in place, so will be fulfilled their communist dream. America will have ceased to exist, as will the sovereignty of every nation. And that is the real reason for September 11th, and the "War on Terror." It is to shore up control of every country that won’t surrender their sovereignty to the global system under the auspices of the United Nations. It is also the reason for the countless states of emergency, warnings, drills, and exercises. The message is clear: Be afraid; be very afraid.

Lest we fall prey to the logic that most certainly the powerful wish for us to adopt, let us always remember the words of Benjamin Franklin.

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Or Patrick Henry...

"Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God, I know not what course others may take, but give me liberty or give me death!"

Liberty and national sovereignty go hand in hand. Without the one, you cannot have the other. Our Founding Fathers provided for us a Constitution that was as miraculous as it was sacred.

Despite the fact that it’s God-inspired words are largely being ignored by our criminal government leaders, the U.S. Constitution stands as a testament to the purity and integrity of what has been, for over 200 years, the greatest country in the history of mankind.

Regardless of despots who conveniently lay claim to the notion that its sacred text is outmoded, its remains as a limit on overbearing government, waiting patiently to be enforced by blind, ignorant, and occupied Americans. It’s words are precious, providing viable principles by which to live, and if necessary — as Patrick Henry suggested — for which to die.

The Founding Fathers knew the value of liberty. If they were alive today, wouldn’t they weep at how quickly their achievements have been squandered?

_ftnref11, New Order of the Barbarians, An Insider Spills The Beans,
a transcript of the reminisces of Dr. Laurence Dunnegan, a pediatric physician, and attendee of a meeting where insider Dr. Richard Day spoke in 1969. Note-taking and recording devices weren't allowed.
_ftnref22, George Bush Sr. speech on September 11, 1990, taken from National Archives_ftnref33,
Blair says 'Let us reorder this world', Michael White, Guardian, October 3, 2001_ftnref44, For more information, see
Two Acts of Tyranny on the Same Day by Daneen G. Petersen

© 2007 Darren Weeks - All Rights Reserved